Sen. Costa, Electoral College Members Cast Presidential Ballots

Sen. Costa speaks to the Electorial College.
![]() Sen. Costa casts his Electorial College ballot. |
Costa, who serves as the Democratic Leader of the Senate, said that he was “honored to be a part of history and participate in the process to elect Barack Obama to another term as President of the United States.
“This is a wonderful experience and it is an important part of our democracy.”
Costa (D-Allegheny) was one of the 538 Electoral College electors nationwide to cast their votes.
“I was privileged to be an elector and be a part of the Electoral College,” Costa said. “The ceremony symbolizes that the power of our nation rests in the people and that our government is accountable to our citizens.”
|
The Electorial College
The Constitution established an electoral college as a compromise between direct popular election of the president and election by Congress. The method of selecting electors was left to the states. |
|
Clifford Levine, an attorney with Cohen and Grigsby, a Pittsburgh law firm, presided over the session. Attorney Levine was elected president of the Electoral College.
All 20 of Pennsylvania’s electoral votes were cast for President Obama because the president carried Pennsylvania by more than 300,000 votes.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Sen.
Vincent Hughes, Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald, Clifford
Levine, President of Electorial College, are pictured with Sen. Costa. |
Sen.
Costa is pictured on the floor of the House of Representatives with
Electors Rich Fitzgerald and House Democratic Leader Frank Dermody
(D-Allegheny). |
![]() |
|
| Electoral College Electors; Sen. Costa is in the back row, third from the right. | |






































5 comments:
THIS IS A SYSTEM GONE HAY WIRE. THIS SHOULD BE CHANGE BY A CONSTUTIONAL AMENDMENT. IT HAS A BECOME A TOTAL DISREGARD FOR THE VOTING PUBLIC AS WE HAVE SEEN IN THE PAST. ONE WAY IS FOR EACH ELECTOR VOTE TO COUNT TOWARDS THE NEW PRESIDENT NOT WINNER TAKE ALL. THE PUBLICS VOICE NEEDS TO BE USED BETTER IN ELECTIONS , NOT JUST A FEW. WE HAVE ENDED UP IN A SOCEITY THAT HAS GONE HAY WIRE ALSO. CURRENT HISTORY SHOWS US WHY. ENOUGH SAID , FREDS DEAD.
sounds like a sore loser to me. you did everything possible to rig the election, and you lost. get over it and move on. funny how you want to cherry pick and use the Constitution to suit your beliefs.
WTF does "Fred's dead" mean anyhow? And what kind of moron keeps using it? Has there ever been an instance of an electoral college person in PA not voting for the winner? Also, when has PA ever voted, in the popular vote, different from the candidate whom the electoral college voted for as a whole? I agree, sounds like someone's candidate didn't win and now they want to change the system. The sooner we get these stupid teabaggers and evenr the Rs out, the better. They want to take America back alright..... back to 1813.
The electoral college count is mandated at the state level and has nothing to do with a change to the constitution. There are several states that actually count the electoral votes and assign them to a party as the votes are made. the rest of the states are a winner take all scenario, but either way, the majority of the popular vote in PA was in favor of the democrat as well as the electoral vote this time around.
i agree.
Post a Comment