Street Machines

Stoltz Of Coudersport

Do You Know: You can buy this marquee ad on Solomon's words for the wise for your business or event for only $10. per day! It's just one of the low cost advertising options available. Your ad is viewed 20,000 to 50,000 times every day. Email us for information on other ad locations.

Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Gun Ban by Executive Order



x

Gun Ban by Executive Order
SturmgewehreSturmgewehre·227 videos
Published on Jan 9, 2013
The news today (1/9/13) is that Obama plans to use Executive Orders to "deal with guns". This rather vague report has spurred a discussion about perhaps plans to ban firearms by Executive Order. Here's the news story: http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/biden-obama-might-use-executive-order-dea...

JOIN THE NRA: http://home.nra.org/#/nraorg
JOIN THE GOA: http://gunowners.org

Please write your Congressmen and Senators using this link: http://www.congress.org/congressorg/mail/?alertid=61046526&type=ML

37 comments :

Anonymous said...

Thanks for the link, I used it to write to my Congressmen and Senators and tell them I fully support a ban on assault weapons!

Anonymous said...

Poster 11:37..better ban your computer..it has apparently turned you into an idiot!

Anonymous said...

Better ban Cigaretts too. They kill more people than guns in this country. Look it up! Oh and baseball bats and car accidents!

Anonymous said...

I sure hope you dont consider yourself as an American.... You dont deserve to be in MY country. Sicko

Anonymous said...

I hope this passes and a ban on all guns gets put into place. In truth if we would outlaw guns there would be a lot less deaths and another school shooting or something that tragic drops in percentage of happening.

Anonymous said...

MILITIA ALERT LEVEL: PURPLE

Based on some guy's vidblog that sucks,
we the 101st Fighting Keyboard Brigade recommend all FREE "real" 'Mericans take the following actions:

-join prepper friends in woods to restart civilization (no cheating! we know it's cold but if you go inside to warm up Obama will win and also probably catch you)

-fight back against all the government forces (using strongly worded letters)

-beware unmarked UN Helicopters sent to gather up all USA firearms leaving us open for NWO invasion (they may come without the helicopters instead disguised as mailmen or utility workers. They won't be a problem if you stay in the woods.)

-avoid FEMA camps. (warning: all public transportation will bus you to FEMA camps, avoid avoid avoid!) I've already said too much.

-Use HAM radios to contact PaliNet. The only free communications left.

-stockpile all copies of the US Constitution and the Holy Bible. (These may be the only copies the future will have to learn from)

Just like when the world ended after they passed the 1994 assault weapons ban, so too will the world end again.

The assault weapons ban that President Ronald Reagan (noted communist and liberal plant) supported. Many consider his support the reason it passed.

...to quote Reagan on the ban:
"it must be passed"

Hug your children and your rifles tonight.
Kiss them and tell them you love them (your kids too).

And now a message to our patriot prepper brethren fighting the good fight:
THE CHAIR IS AGAINST THE WALL,
THE FALCON FLIES AT THE CROW'S CRY,
MCCONNELL IS A TURTLE,
MCRIB IS BACK,
JOHN HAS A LONG MUSTACHE.

Anonymous said...

Thanks. I emailed in favor of the assault weapons ban.

Anonymous said...

Ted Kennedy's car killed more people than my guns

Anonymous said...

This executive order is just stupid. Since when does a "gun" have a brain? It doesn't, it takes a human to do the deed, make it harder to get them do better background checks. But don't take any gun away from law abiding people

Anonymous said...

GET OUT OF MY COUNTRY TRAITOR!!!!!

Anonymous said...

I hope the silent majority in this country win. I too support the assault weapons and high capacity clip ban. We plain don't need them.

Anonymous said...

The sniveling liberals can have my weapons...bullets first.

Anonymous said...

'Assault weapons' have been banned since 1934, dumbass. the Clinton 1994 "assault weapons ban" was NOT a ban on assault weapons. make sure you know what you're talking about before having an opinion on it. you want a ban on a black semi-auto 223 rifle, whereas a semi-auto 223 rifle with a wood stock is fine because it doesnt LOOK as evil. AR15s are NOT M16s, they are NOT 'assault rifles', and the 223 is NOT a 'high powered caliber'; its actually banned for deer hunting in some states because its not powerful enough.

i'm not a doctor, therefore when mine tells me something, i listen. i know enough not to run my mouth on something i dont know what i'm talking about. i suggest you heed the same advice.

PS. my AR15- any of them that i own- have never shot at anyone, as well as any other firearm i own. and all my high-cap mags? yea, they never hurt anyone either.

Anonymous said...

Just what we need, more laws protecting stupid people.

Anonymous said...

I pray you never have your door kicked in at 3am by 3 crackheads looking to rape your wife and child & rob you.
When seconds count, the police are only minutes away.

Anonymous said...

Real men keep AK's. You can have all the 223's

Anonymous said...

People really don't know what the second amendment was intended for.It was for defending ourselves against any threats.Domestic or foreign.Including our own government out of control.People we lose more rights everyday under the guise of fear.Look how many rights we have lost due to terrorism.Illegal searches and siezures.Illegal roadside checkpoints.Naked body scanners at airports to name a few.What happened in Conn. was terrible.But ask our government how many little innocent Iraqi children have been killed since the start of a war based on lies.Hundreds of thousands and now even more are being born with birth defects from uranium.You won't hear this on the bought and paid for corporate news channels.People Wake up and smell the roses.Personally if it does come down to a civil war.Why should the governments foriegn UN troops be the only ones equipped with assault rifles.Yes soldiers from different countries from the UN would be the ones going door to door for gun collection.Not our military or police officers.

Anonymous said...

I hope Obumer does enact a ban. This will create an awesome black market for assault weapons, high capacity mags and ammo. No registering and no taxes. Lets do this.

Anonymous said...

IF the law passes and guns are banned. They will come door to door and search every house. Collectors of guns and museums will also have their guns taken by force.

What will be left is:
*Guns owned and used by the military,law enforcement and criminals.

Anonymous said...

The paranoia is thicker than limburgher here...

Just so ya know....

As The Atlantic noted on Wednesday, gun advocates can stop “freaking out” because Obama cannot ban assault weapons or close the gun show loophole without Congress.

The president, however, can take small steps like modernizing the background check system and limiting importation of assault rifles.

Raw Story (http://s.tt/1yf6S)


Start acting like adults and join the fucking conversation so that we, as a nation, can take steps to keep these very deadly weapons out of the hands of totally whacked out loons.

What the fuck?!?!?!? 20 1st graders wasn't enough?!?!?!

Anonymous said...

I have an idea- Lets ban mass shootings!

Anonymous said...

Some of you people are just morons. If one of those children murdered at Sandy Hook was yours, I'll bet you would feel differently. On second thought, I hope you never HAVE children because you aren't responsible enough to be a parent and you obviously don't care if some mentally ill sicko or crack head gets ahold of ANY kind of gun and just blows innocent children away.

Anonymous said...

Everyone knows that we owe China a ton of money.What everyone probably doesn't know is that China is demanding our government to unarm the public.Look it up.

Anonymous said...

Isn't it ironic how this government sends firearms illegally to Mexican Drug Cartels, where we have a dead American Border Agent, many dead Mexicans including a beauty queen, and now it has a problem with law abiding citizens' God given right? None of these proposals would do anything to prevent any of the recent atrocities. They use the terms "Assault" and "Weapons of War", which is all a big lie. What they really mean is "All Weapons".

It isn't the Government's place to prevent this kind of horror. The States and local communities have to figure this out. What is occurring in the Government Schools to create these monsters? It could be bad parenting. The killer's father, who was very well off, hadn't had anything to do with the kid for a long time. Perhaps people should have to apply and be vetted for parenthood? There was another shooting today in California, where they have strict gun laws. The shooter used a shot gun, he had "pockets full" of shells. An armed retired Police officer out front would have prevented this.

Korean merchants used these weapons to defend their businesses during the LA riots. They have been used after hurricanes to defend what little private property was left. I have one and feel very confident I could defend my family from intruders. The economy stinks and crime is on the rise. Drug addicts break in looking for prescriptions. A woman in Atlanta recently had to defend her two small children from some big ugly guy. They were hidden and the intruder came for them. She shot him in the face 5 out of 6 times with a .38 and he kept coming for them. Sometimes 10 rounds isn't enough...

Anonymous said...

...And if you're on Welfare you should not be permitted to vote. You do not have the right to vote for higher taxes for me when you don't contribute. Once you are a self sustaining, productive American, you can be able to vote again.

Anonymous said...

Im not a moron. I made a comment or 2 about standing up for my rights here. I have 2 children. And I also enjoy my gun collection. Even the "scary looking ones". And as far as protecting either, why dont you come to my house uninvited and I will show you why I have them. You cowardly fool

Anonymous said...

@12:01:00 AM

Are you gonna tell your retired neighbors who have worked their entire lives and are now just squeaking by on 700 bux a month + food stamps that they can no longer vote?

What kind of an asshole are you?

Are you gonna tell the young couple down the street, both working at Trucklight or Empereon that they can't vote because neither of those 2 places of employment pays enough to feed their young child so they are forced to rely on foodstamps that they don't get to vote?

What kind of an asshole are you?

You can shove that attitude where your head is at.

Anonymous said...

9:21:00- "you obviously don't care if some mentally ill sicko or crack head gets ahold of ANY kind of gun and just blows innocent children away."

Nice liberal logic. Has to be one or the other right? I come from a line of military veterans, some combat, and served myself. Every man in my family on my fathers side has served in the military, to defend the rights os US citizens. All rights, even ones such as flag-buring that I *HATE* they have the right to- but as an American they do because of the 1st Amendment. I have strong favor for the 2nd- but because of that, it automatically means I just LOVE seeing people killed by guns, huh? That school shooters are even better because the victims were even MORE innocent, right? Are you seriously that retarded that you simply MUST equate a specific amendment favor to a liking for violence? As I’m sure every NRA member like myself felt, 20 children’s lives lost is unbearable. It pains me that there is that much evil in the world that people are willing to take firearms and shoot people for no reason, ESPECIALLY kids. Its downright ignorant to think that NRA members support this kind of gun violence. If anything, the NRA is more vocal than ANY gun-related lobby group on reducing gun-violence and crime. And yes- don’t tell me they’re not; anti-gun groups focus on guns themselves, pro-gun groups focus on the criminals. For years the NRA has been pushing to enforce stronger sentencing. Why create new gun laws when we don’t enforce crime laws? You cannot impose punishment of the innocent because of the actions of the guilty. And to assume that because we defend our Constitutional rights it equates to defending the actions of criminals who abuse those rights? Its retarded, its asinine, and its textbook ignorance.

Anonymous said...

AMEN!!!!

Anonymous said...

poster 9:46 jan. 10 you hit it on thehead china wents to rule our courty becawe dump ass borrow money from them and as long as we ouen gunsthere is no control on us people.myself owen lots of guns all kinds.home made ones there are call sizpguns so if sicko went guns they canmake on,and you dont have bullets for they,just porter said bombs worse then guns.

Anonymous said...

@ 8:24am

Where you are in life is based on past decisions. If you are not happy, you have to blame yourself. You should have developed better job marketing skills instead of producing offspring you can't afford.

Anonymous said...

@12:40:00 PM

You did not answer the question.

Or were you just trolling?

Anonymous said...

@3:07 pm

Not only did I answer your question, I provided the solution. We have more takers than makers in this Country. The current levels of spending are not sustainable. Even though it is a ponzi scheme, I was not referring to social security. Welfare and food stamps however were not meant to be a way of means. You have the right to the Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, however you do not have the right to a nice life at others' expense.

Anonymous said...

No you didn't. The right to vote is enshrined in the constitution and further enhanced by several amendments.

You bitched and moaned about the sad history of the effects of the conservative's embrace of trickle down economics coupled with deregulation that has rendered the American economy incapable of providing sustainable living wage employment.

Just because the banking sector ravaged your elderly neighbor's retirement is no reason to deny them the right to vote.

Just because the offshoring of the American manufacturing sector has led to service sector jobs that pay pvertry level wages is no reason to deny an American citizen the right to vote.

You answered the voices in your own head and ignored the question I posed.

The fact that more and more people now qualify for means tested social benefits is not a response to why you don't want them to vote.

Rather...It's an indictment of conservative economics.

(PS, PA Social Spending data is here - it's way way down, historically speaking...http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/year_spending_2013PAbn_13bs1n_40#usgs302

You would never click that though, you'd rather cling to your God and Guns and ignorance.

Anonymous said...

In all honesty, Land Owners should be the only ones allowed to vote.

Anonymous said...

And Senators should be selected by State Governors, rather than elected.

Anonymous said...

Hell why not make it only white men while your at it! Damn your stupid as shit