Stoltz

Howard's Inc, Coudersport, PA

xxx

xxx

Do You Know: You can buy this marquee ad on Solomon's words for the wise for your business or event for only $10. per day! It's just one of the low cost advertising options available. Your ad is viewed 40,000 to 70,000 times every day. Email us for information on other ad locations.

Solomon's Auction & Yard Sale Page

UPMC Cole

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Shinglehouse Woman Provided Alcohol To 7 Minors

A Shinglehouse woman will be charged with 7 counts of providing alcohol to minors in District Judge Barbara Easton's court.

Gloria J. Smith, 57, is alleged to have hosted a party at her residence at the intersection of Honeyoye Street and Wapseni Road, in Sharon Township last month.

Troopers say she provided alcoholic beverages to a 17 year old boy, 2- 16 year old boys, a 15 year old boy, and a 14 year old boy, all from Shinglehouse. A 15 year old girl from Shinglehouse, and a girl from Greenwood, NY. were also listed.

The seven underage individuals will be charged with underage consumption of alcohol.

16 comments :

Anonymous said...

I hope momma get charged also.

Anonymous said...

WAY TO GO....POTTER COUNTY AT IT'S FINEST

Anonymous said...

Please treat this situation seriously. I personally know of a similar situation a few years ago, that caused instant death to one teen-ager, and certainly altered the life of another. Serving alcohol to minors is a very serious offense that should be treated accordingly. If acceptable, just laws are not in place to deal with such situations, then a judge's hands are tied.

Anonymous said...

Suppose this were a 57 year old man hosting a party at his residence and provided alcohol to a 17 year old girl, 2- 16 year old girls, a 15 year old girl, a 14 year old girl and a couple of teen aged boys. The man would be hung by his privates (so-to-speak) and the people of the county would label him a child pedophile, a sick-o, a pervert and whatever other names they could think of along these lines. When the tables are turned and a woman is responsible for committing the same crime, her hands are slapped and life goes on for her. It will never make any sense to me........

fred said...

I read the artical to say the woman is getting 7 counts of furnishing to minors. I'd say that about holds her accountable....

Anonymous said...

Yes, but had that been a man and not a woman. The man would be facing more charges automatically for just being a man. The woman needs to held MORE accountable is what I think the 2:44 poster was getting at. Women can pe peddy's too.

Anonymous said...

"I read the artical to say the woman is getting 7 counts of furnishing to minors. I'd say that about holds her accountable...." .....sure until she sees the judge and....."a woman is responsible for committing the same crime, her hands are slapped and life goes on for her."----so so true

Anonymous said...

This is a crime committed by an adult or adults and yet PSP is seeking to prosecute the minors...I disagree! Minors are easily led astray by adults who are suppose to be responsible for their guidance. For PSP this is just about financial gains not justice! Ex. Were the teens fined for drinking at the prom? Do the research no fines were levied! Welcome to the city of double standards! And lastly is this the only place where drinks were consumed by these teens? No! So where does the blame fall? My regards to PSP to sort this one out.

Anonymous said...

This woman is a menace. Anyone who would do some of the things she has done needs to pay for the crime. Those kids were not old enough to make a decision for themselves. It is time for her to pay the piper. Yes I believe in God's grace but I also believe in consequences for actions. She has got serious problems and it is time for her impriosnment for the seriousness of her crime. No plea bargaining, sweeping it under the carpet but it is time for action Potter County.

Anonymous said...

Well, kids got caught at the OVHS Prom with alcohol and the school was not held accountable for allowing it. Heck, they let some off because one took the blame. Seems to me, of all places the school should provide a safe inviroment for their students. Yes, I believe this woman should pay the price but also here is that double standard...

Anonymous said...

THEY ALL NEED TO BE CHARGED AND SHE NEEDS CHARGED BIG TIME....THEY ARE ALL OLD ENOUGH TO KNOW IT IS WORNG TO DRINK UNDER AGE...NO SLAPPED HANDS JUST CHARGE THEM ALL.

Anonymous said...

Well way to go this has gone on long enough charge all of them and that is how I feel....Kids at school and now it is gonna go on at personal homes it needs to stop charge them all.

Anonymous said...

WELL WAY TO GO POTTER COUNTY THERE IS ENOUGH OF THIS THAT GOES ON IN THIS AREA....NOW IT I TIME FOR IT TO STOP.IF IT IS STOPPED HERE AND THEY ALL GET CHARGED MAYBE IT WILL PUT A LITTLE SCARE IN THE NEXT ONE WHO WANTS TO SERVE MINORS.WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS WOMEN SHE IS OLD ENOUGH TO KNOW MINORS SHOULD NOT DRINK.JUST BECAUSE THEY WANT ITIS THAT WHY IT WAS GOTTON FOR THEM...WOULD SHE GIVE THEM A GUN TO IF THEY WANTED THAT.SHE NEEDS TO BE CHARGED.I THINK THEY ALL EVEN THE SEVEN KIDS NEED TO BE CHARGED ALL OF THEM.

Anonymous said...

This is a crime committed by an adult or adults and yet PSP is seeking to prosecute the minors...
At 17, 16, 15, and 14 they're all old enough to know right from wrong...regardless. Yes, I agree they should all be charged......as should their parents (or at least fined) who should be involved enough to know what their little delinquents....I mean "darlings" were up to.

Anonymous said...

i think this whole this is crap bc this women didnt even serve minors two of the boys showed up drunk and now the other kids an this mom is gettin charged thats rediculs. this is a whole bunch of stupid shinglehouse people talkin carp an then people who are INNOCENT gettin in trouble for it, the only people who shoul get chraged with underage are the two boys who showed up drunk an the only reason that they were at her house later was bc the two boys were sick and throwin up and all gloria did was gave the kids a place to sleep so they werent out on the street. and by helpin a kid she gets all that crap. thats stupid cause ik countless amout of people who serve minors every freakin weekend and dont get in trouble but the one innconet lady get in trouble.. i think shingle house needs to get a life and stop starting roumers to try to get people in trouble..and thats my comment on this cituation.

Anonymous said...

These kids have lived in shinglehouse there whole lives. They have watched there older brothers and sisters do the same and there parents allowed it for them, so thats why they now think it is okay for them. Personally if you didn't want those kids at that persons house then why didn't you know where they were and what they were doing. Yes it was wrong if this is even true, but think about all the times minors could of gotten underages and were let off the hook. You can't just charge some of them and not all of them. Including the adults...Its by choice in Shinglehouse not by whats right and whats wrong.