Stoltz of Coudersport

Howard's Inc, Coudersport, PA

Bokman of Wellsville, NY

solomon's words

solomon's words

xxx

xxx

Do You Know: You can buy this marquee ad on Solomon's words for the wise for your business or event for only $10. per day! It's just one of the low cost advertising options available. Your ad is viewed 40,000 to 70,000 times every day. Email us for information on other ad locations.

Solomon's Auction & Yard Sale Page

UPMC Cole Healthy Holidays

UPMC Cole Healthy Holidays

UPMC Cole

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Child Pornography in Cameron County

On March 19th at 11 am Trooper John Whitcomb was dispatched to multiple locations throughout Cameron County, Pa. State police are investigating an incident involving a known juvenile female who was transmitting obscene photographs of herself via a cellular telephone to several known individuals. The investigation is still in effect. Charges pertaining to transmitting child pornography will be filed against the known juvenile pending further investigation. Anyone who has information pertaining to this incident is asked to please contact Trooper John Whitcomb at (814)-486-3321.

12 comments :

Anonymous said...

Child pornography laws were written to protect kids, not incriminate them. This is still wrong, there should be some consequence for it- but does this girl really deserve to be listed as a known sex offender?

Anonymous said...

One down, millions more to catch. Don't they know this will NEVER go away? Don't they realize that one day they may want to marry and the guy might get wind and consider the girl a whore?

Anonymous said...

I don't see where it says that she will be listed as a known sex offender. Certain charges may be filed, but that might not be what she is sentenced to.

"Pending further investigation..."

Anonymous said...

She will be charged with sending child pornography. Same charge as any old pervert that emails them. She will be listed as a sex offender. That is the way the law is written. There is no age limit, She sent them, even if it is of herself.

Anonymous said...

@11:35 AM - If some guy has a problem with his future wife just because of some youthful indiscretion, he's an ignorant jerk that doesn't deserve her in the first place.

Sounds to me like this young lady will have some hard lessons to learn, but I doubt it'll result in a listing on sex offender registry.

Anonymous said...

The whole this is BS. If he or she is old enough to have a cell phone and he or she wants to send pics of themselves to others, that's their right. What does the fact they may be under 18 have to do with it? So if you are 18 its OK if you are 17 its not? BULL....

Anonymous said...

3:17, you're a pervert!

Anonymous said...

Not long ago i heard a girl from the area is making xxx movies while going to college in lock haven! The sad part is everyone thinks it's great!

Anonymous said...

If it is a child, where are her parents and why aren't they checking her phone? Not really sure why kids think it is ok to post and send anything they want nowadays. Disgusting!

Anonymous said...

While single, everybody wants to nail or be nailed by every human walking on two feet. But, when they marry, they want a virgin.

Anonymous said...

Way to go Mom and Dad.
And your little girl needs a phone because of ... what again?
How do you know what she is going with her phone when you are not with her?
You are to blame for allowing her to have this electronic gadget.

Anonymous said...

i live in that town and i can say that sometimes its not the parents doing these kids do what they want right or wrong i know i was a teen 6 years ago and truth be told what you do when you are a child sometimes affects everyone. but this does not mean sheis a horrible person and for those thinking about what her future husband may think your past is your past if you cant break through it there is no future instead of talking bad about this matter how about finding a way to reach out to that girl and making her feel like she is important and should have some kind of support.
judge not less ye be judged?