e&g

Coudersport Ice Mine Opens On Friday, June 5th. Hours are 10 a.m.- 6 p.m. Wednesday thru Sunday. Admission Adults $5.00. Children 6-12 $2.50. 176 Ice Mine Road, Coudersport, PA.

Stoltz of Coudersport

Howard's Inc, Coudersport, PA

jvb

jvb

Solomon's Words for the Wise

xxx

xxx

Southern Tier Polaris, Olean, NY

Do You Know: You can buy this marquee ad on Solomon's words for the wise for your business or event for only $10. per day! It's just one of the low cost advertising options available. Your ad is viewed 40,000 to 70,000 times every day. Email us for information on other ad locations.

Solomon's Auction & Yard Sale Page

UPMC Cole

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

USDA Reverses Itself and Exempts Rural Properties with Gas Drilling Leases from NEPA

USDA Reverses Itself and Exempts Rural Properties with Gas Drilling Leases from NEPA

By Josh Fox http://www.facebook.com/joshfoxintlwow

[New York – March 20, 2012] In a move that has angered hydrofracking opponents, the USDA did an about-face and reneged on earlier statements that its popular rural housing loans on properties with gas drilling leases would have to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and today authorized an Administrative Notice stating that rural housing loans would be excluded from NEPA. On Monday, The New York Times had reported the USDA was planning on issuing an Administrative Notice to the opposite effect, telling staff that loans on properties with gas leases must undergo a full environmental review as required by NEPA before mortgage loans are made or guaranteed by the agency.

"The proposal by the Agriculture Department, which has signaled its intention in e-mails to Congress and landowners, reflects a growing concern that lending to owners of properties with drilling leases might violate the National Environmental Policy Act, known as NEPA, which requires environmental reviews before federal money is spent,” the Times wrote. The article quoted the program director for rural loans in the Agriculture Department’s New York office saying that, “We will no longer be financing homes with gas leases.” “Approval of such leases would allow for a number of potential impacts to possibly occur which would need to be analyzed in a NEPA document that would be reviewed by the public for sufficiency,” another USDA official was quoted as saying.

But in an email statement yesterday, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack reversed those positions and said, “USDA will not make any policy changes related to rural housing loans…The information provided to Congressional offices on March 8, 2012 was premature and does not reflect past, current or future practices of the department. Tomorrow, I will authorize an Administrative Notice reaffirming that rural housing loans are categorically excluded under the National Environmental Policy Act.”

“This is a very important development and one that we need to speak up about,” said Josh Fox, writer/director of the acclaimed hydrofracking film “GasLands.” “A full NEPA review, like the type the agency was talking about affirming, would have been more transparent, more rigorous and comprehensive. USDA staff experts in the NY office as well as in DC made clear in emails that the law and the science require that mortgages with drilling leases shouldn’t be exempt from NEPA. This 180-degress turn by Secretary Vilsack contradicts both science and law.”

Excluding NEPA review of fracking's environmental impacts is a significant move. It means that environmental review of rural housing loans would be limited to the EPA's far less comprehensive national study of fracking, which is focused exclusively on drinking water and does not admit public comment. Doing a NEPA analysis would have ensured that federal agencies issuing loans are complying with the law. In fact, officials expressed concern the agency would be vulnerable to lawsuits if they didn’t conduct the NEPA reviews thoroughly enough. But exempting rural housing loans from NEPA means that gas drilling leases will also be exempt from legal recourse and other basic public interest protections the law was meant to provide.

3 comments :

Anonymous said...

And if the greenies get their way, how might that effect Veterans Administration mortgage loans (government backed--to a degree) for returning veterans?

Would a vet purchasing land for his primary residence (homestead) need to comply with comprehensive and costly NEPA regulations simply because he was taking out a VA-backed loan?

Does anyone honestly believe that a vet coming home after 4, 20, or 30 years should undergo more environmental scrutiny (including a public comment period)for approval of his loan(same property)than the gal who gets a loan from C&N or the Hamlin Bank instead of through the VA?

The USDA is on the right track here!

Anonymous said...

Josh Fox needs to GET A LIFE or better yet a real job...

Anonymous said...

and you do what ? wow because someone care's about others other than themselve's and is trying to help ....what are you doing ?