SOLOMON'S WORDS

E&G

Stoltz

Lori Johnson Candidate For Bradford Township Supervisor

Lori Johnson Candidate For Bradford Township Supervisor

DR. Tarbox

DR. Tarbox

xxx

xxx

UPMC Cole Careers

Solomon's Auction & Yard Sale Page

UPMC Cole

Saturday, February 22, 2014

Corbett Administration Appeal Of Local Zoning For Oil & Gas Denied By Supreme Court

Pa. Supreme Court will not reconsider Act 13 decision

February 21, 2014 | 4:39 PM
By Marie Cusick
State Impact

Pennsylvania's highest court threw out sections of the state's oil and gas law in December, saying they violated citizens' environmental rights.

Pennsylvania’s highest court has denied a request by the Corbett administration to reconsider its recent decision, which found portions of the state’s oil and gas law unconstitutional.

In a 4-2 decision in December, the state Supreme Court court threw out portions of the law, known as Act 13, which restricted local zoning of oil and gas development.

One section of the law that was struck down called for statewide rules on oil and gas to preempt local zoning rules. Another section required local governments to allow oil and gas development in all zoning areas.

In the majority opinion, written by Chief Justice Ronald Castille, the court determined both those provisions violated the Environmental Rights Amendment of the state constitution, which guarantees Pennsylvanians the right to “clean air, pure water, and to the preservation of the natural, scenic, historic and esthetic values of the environment. ”

The decision was hailed as a major victory by environmental groups and local governments who argued Act 13 went too far in restricting local authority.

In January, the Corbett administration asked the court to reconsider its decision. Corbett’s General Counsel James Schultz argued the court, “made its own sweeping factual findings regarding the impact of Act 13″ without giving the state an opportunity to present its own evidence.

The court issued an order today simply stating, “the application for reargument or reconsideration of the opinions entered by this Court on December 19, 2013 is denied.”  

Read more...

No comments :