Street Machines

www.streetmachinesautocare.com

xxx

xxx

Do You Know: You can buy this marquee ad on Solomon's words for the wise for your business or event for only $10. per day! It's just one of the low cost advertising options available. Your ad is viewed 40,000 to 70,000 times every day. Email us for information on other ad locations.

Solomon's Auction & Yard Sale Page

Really Rural

Stoltz of Coudersport, PA

stoltzcars.com

Howard's Inc, Coudersport, PA

UPMC Cole

Thursday, April 13, 2017

Court Rules Language In Act 13 Allows Gas Producers To Avoid Impact Fee Payment To Municipalities

Wolf says Act 13 language should be fixed to protect impact-fee revenue

By
State Impact
Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf said late Wednesday that the wide-ranging Act 13 law should be changed to ensure that municipalities receive all the revenue they are entitled to from the state’s impact fee on gas drilling.

Wolf’s office issued a statement in support of the Public Utility Commission which said Tuesday that the law’s language should be changed so that drillers cannot escape paying the fee on low-producing gas wells. The regulator also said it would appeal a recent Commonwealth Court ruling that would limit the fees payable on the so-called stripper wells.

“As a result of the recent court decision, counties and municipalities across the state which receive impact fee revenues to address critical infrastructure needs and impacts of natural gas development will receive millions less this year and in future years,” the statement said. ”The Governor believes that the language should be fixed to ensure that counties and municipalities receive the funding they depend on.”

Wolf said the court ruling also shows the need for a severance tax on gas production, which he continues to press for despite opposition from the Republican-led legislature.

PUC chair Gladys Brown wrote to Wolf on Tuesday, saying the ruling could “significantly jeoparidize” current and future fees paid by the industry. She argued that last month’s ruling was inconsistent with Act 13 that set up the impact fee, and would accelerate recent declines in revenue from the fee paid by producers.

The PUC, which administers the fee, has argued that it is payable on stripper wells if they produce at least 90,000 cubic feet of gas a day for any month of the year, based on the Act 13 definition of a stripper well as one that is incapable of producing more than 90,000 cubic feet of gas a day during any calendar month.

That’s at odds with the court’s ruling that Snyder Brothers, a Kittanning-based gas driller, had to pay the fee only if the wells’ output exceeded the 90,000 cubic-foot minimum on every month of the year.

The ruling followed a lawsuit against the PUC by Snyder and the Pennsylvania Independent Oil and Gas Association (PIOGA). The association’s general counsel, Kevin Moody, responding to the PUC’s letter, said the commission had used a different standard in arguing its case to the court than it had in any of its orders implementing the impact fee.

Moody predicted the PUC will lose its appeal. “I’m confident that the PUC’s attempt to make this case into something else — about fears and notions of unlawful behavior by producers, completely without support in the record — will fail,” he said. “I look forward to responding to the PUC’s appeal request.”

Revenue from the fee has dropped in recent years as the low price of natural gas has curtailed drilling, reducing the number of newer wells that produce the most revenue. Read more...

1 comment :

Anonymous said...

It appears that these drilling companies will do anything, I mean anything to put the screws to anyone they can. Can't we all see that, especially after this boondoggle? Why don't other people open their eyes and see just how greedy and dishonest they are?